Shortcast
AI Podcast Player

Short podcasts with real voices

The Herd with Colin Cowherd

Hoops Tonight - CAVS-KNICKS REACTION: Jalen Brunson & Josh Hart's redemption lead Game 2 win vs. Harden & Mitchell

--% time saved
PodcastThe Herd with Colin Cowherd
Publisher/creatoriHeartPodcasts and The Volume
Published
Shortcast updated

About this episode

Jason reacts live after Game 2 of the NBA Eastern Conference Finals between the New York Knicks and Cleveland Cavaliers. He breaks down Jalen Brunson and Karl-Anthony Towns facing James Harden and Donovan Mitchell in a key game in the third round of the NBA playoffs. All lines presented by Hard Rock Bet . #Volume  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Loading episode data...

Episode summary

Heavy Thursday, jam‑packed show and a longer mailbag tonight. Quick story to set the mood: I was on Zach Lowe’s show this morning, and he floated that Josh Hart might flip the script in Game 2—then Hart went career night, five threes, seven dimes, nonstop juice; giving him a long leash early let him find rhythm, and it blew up Cleveland’s plan to ignore him.

Hart’s jumpers pulled the bigs out of the lane, the switches got pricier, and he held up better on Donovan. New York’s coverage also simplified—less wild blitzing, more contain and short rotations—so those four‑on‑threes shrank fast. On the other end, every time they parked the wrong defender on Brunson, he got what he wanted and beat the extra help by finding the middle flash for clean reads.

Bigger Cavs issue: missed freebies and open looks, or the defensive plan?

The scheme, by far. The shooting will ebb and flow, but you cannot survive long stretches where you can’t string stops, and New York hit a 14‑0 burst when Cleveland’s coverage gave Brunson comfort and the Knicks machine just kept spitting out quality.

There’s a report the Cavs promised Harden a new deal. He’s been unreliable in the playoffs. Worth more than a one‑year flyer?

Brunson cooking that matchup is real, but almost no lead initiators guard him credibly either. As a secondary creator Harden’s been solid—lots of hockey assists, about a point per possession including passes—so the turnover chatter misses the value he’s generating; the louder concern is Mitchell’s night‑to‑night swing.

Some say the trade was a mistake and Garland would be better. Fair?

When Mitchell stalled late, Harden still created advantages that teammates didn’t cash in. You can’t really bench him because he’s their best steady engine, but the staff needs a real plan to protect a skill guard in space—every contender has one.

What about fit tweaks—like adding a star wing—so they can mix lineups if a small guard gets hunted?

A big wing creator changes the geometry and gives them benchable flexibility in certain matchups. Regardless, they still need a pressure plan on Brunson—soft shows with no on‑ball heat are gifting New York great looks.

On the Knicks, is OG’s minute load and careful driving just ramp‑up management?

His minutes dipped a touch because Hart and another wing earned time, not due to a hard cap. The drives felt situational—more middle actions were open for Bridges and Hart, so OG picked his spots.

If New York gets rest and the West champ is banged up, does that level things?

Rest helps anyone, but it really tilts if San Antonio limps through; they’re piling injuries. Against OKC, even short‑handed, I’d still lean Thunder, though the Knicks have a real shot.

Spurs plan if Fox and Harper sit?

Win with defense and pace control, because OKC has been scorching unguarded threes while San Antonio’s been cold. Disconnect the matchup anchor with hard screens and early foul pressure; if that big sits, the size gap finally matters—Game 3 leans Spurs, Game 4 likely turns into a street fight.

Quick officiating angle: the physical play on the big and the flopping discourse—where do you land?

The rugged stuff on the big is savvy playoff basketball; the whistle could swing next game, but I’d keep doing it. The flopping talk around the star guard is mostly noise—refs aren’t rewarding it much, it looks lame, and it trickles to teammates—but it hasn’t decided the series; the league should fix incentives so players drop the habit.

It’s not an edge so much as a bad look, and it spreads down the roster.

Agreed. Different standard for an MVP‑level face of the league, and the style warps culture; still, through two games the whistles have basically balanced out.

Last one, non‑basketball: thoughts on Fender sending cease‑and‑desists over Strat‑style builds, given PRS Silver Sky?

The Strat silhouette is so established that tasteful interpretations feel fair game, and the Silver Sky isn’t a clone—it’s PRS build quality with distinct tweaks and a killer neck. Legal skirmishes popped up before, but the instrument stands on its own; if you play, try one.

That’s it for tonight. Thanks for hanging with us—film breakdowns drop tomorrow, and we’re live after Western Conference Finals Game 3.

Download on the App Store
QR Code - Scan to download

Ready to save time?

Download Shortcast and get started today

Download on the App Store
QR Code - Scan to download