About this episode
Jason is joined by Yahoo! NBA analyst Kevin O'Connor to break down contender rankings for the 2026 NBA title. They discuss the Oklahoma City Thunder and Denver Nuggets still being at the top, why James Harden and the Cleveland Cavaliers are rising, why they'll never count out Anthony Edwards and the Minnesota Timberwolves, how high up the Boston Celtics should be now and if Jayson Tatum returns, whether Luka Doncic and the Los Angeles Lakers can crack the top 10, why Kevin Durant and the Houston Rockets have fallen since the last rankings, Jalen Brunson's New York Knicks, Victor Wembanyama's San Antonio Spurs, and more. All lines presented by Hard Rock Bet . #Volume See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen to the original episode
Episode summary
Happy Thursday, everybody. I’m fired up for this contender‑tiers show with Kevin O’Connor; it’s a snapshot, not gospel, and we can change our minds before the playoffs.
I’m great and headed to L.A. for All‑Star, but I’m most excited to dig into the top of the league instead of the tank race.
OKC is still my number one, though not in a tier by themselves; the defense is the steadiest thing in basketball, SGA’s knocking on best‑in‑the‑world talk, but they’ve shown cracks in contested shooting, rebounding, and ball‑handling depth when guys are out.
I agree on OKC at one, just not on their own; durability matters, the West improved, and adding a knockdown option like Jared McCain only boosts their flexibility.
Their optionality is real—AJ Mitchell brings burst that complements Jalen’s power—and those injury weeks gave secondary creators useful reps; for two, I’m on Denver and think their recent skid is them recalibrating back to Jokic’s defensive style.
That’s it; they’ve been leaky on defense while juggling lineups and a tough schedule, but I’m not overreacting and still have them second.
Give it a week or two and their rotations around Jokic should click; the clutch defense has been rough without Aaron Gordon, but the Jokic‑Murray‑Gordon minutes scream two‑way ceiling, and this is the deepest version of their core.
Same read—Murray and Gordon look like their best selves, and Denver’s got plenty of lineup answers next to Jokic.
Against OKC’s length and rim protection, do you worry about Denver’s matchup?
It’s tough; Denver may need to lean on zone again to tilt OKC into jumpers, and Jokic will have to be otherworldly with healthy help.
At three, I’m buying Cleveland; the East path is lighter, Ellis and Schroeder give them quick‑guard coverage, Harden plus Mitchell create, Mobley and Allen screen, and the shooters stretch you, with only some concern about bully‑ball fronts.
I circled back to the Cavs after the deadline; Harden’s a sturdier upgrade over Garland, Ellis adds defense, they’re my current East favorite, but I still slot them a hair below OKC and Denver.
Harden fits better as a number two next to Mitchell’s reliable playoff scoring, and if he stays attentive, he’s a workable defender behind Mobley and Allen.
Totally; he can impact without carrying the scoring load every night.
I’ve got Minnesota in my top tier because their fastball—rim protection, rangy defense, and big creators—can bother anyone, and they match up well with OKC and Denver.
I’m close but not there; the team’s energy swings and Julius Randall’s volatility make me hesitate, even though they check nearly every box when locked in.
Their size and skill have already dented OKC and Denver, but at five I go San Antonio; they’re smash‑mouth, elite in clutch and margins, and protect the paint, yet playoff scouting could dare their guards to shoot and get physical with Wemby, leaving the Fox‑Wemby two‑man game to carry a lot.
Same spot, a tier lower; shooting from Fox, Castle, and Harper is the swing, and I wish they’d added a high‑end spacer, because that may matter across a full series.
Young stars need playoff scars, and Wemby will get his; next is Detroit, who’ve mauled teams on the margins and owned top‑10 opponents, but a middling half‑court offense makes a title jump feel early.
I’d put Boston ahead if Tatum returns close to form; they can match the grit and also win the half court.
Boston’s in this tier for me but lower due to unknowns; Missoula’s system kept them top‑tier on both ends without stars, and Tatum’s health plus Vucevic’s defensive fit will decide their ceiling.
The buy‑in and lineup flexibility are real; with Tatum back, they’re a true threat.
I dropped Houston to seven; great metrics, but clutch offense and defense lag, losing Steven Adams hurts dimensions, Amen’s spacing and Sengun’s defense are issues, and they lean heavy on KD.
I’ve got them tenth; the development track and public shots at Sengun worry me, his isolation defense will get hunted, and losing the two‑big hammer takes away a fail‑safe.
Sengun has the tools and has to make a leap, but the dunker‑spot looks with Amen die against elite backlines, so late‑game offense probably stays bumpy.
There’s also a missing intangible; an early exit wouldn’t surprise me.
At eight, the Knicks’ wings are better, they trust the pass, and they’re beating good teams, but past playoff entry points and mistakes keep them tier two.
Same slot for me, a tier under San Antonio, Boston, and Detroit.
Lakers at ten; even during their best stretch they’ve struggled against elite teams, and without more burst and shooting, a title run would ask too much of the big three.
I’ve got them ninth with Philly lurking if Embiid is healthy; Reeves is legit, but banking on months of supernova offense is unrealistic.
Kevin, this was a blast—check out The Kevin O’Connor Show—and we’ll be back Monday with Power Rankings; have a great weekend and we’ll see you then.